Live vs literature case studies, permissions and etiquette, the measured drawing method, what to record on site, and a sheet template for turning it all into analysis a jury can read.
An architecture case study is a structured record of an existing building: its site, climate, users, programme, structure, services and materials, documented in drawings and photographs and then analysed so you can learn from it. You will do two kinds. A live case study means visiting, measuring and photographing a building yourself. A literature case study is built from published drawings and writing. Below: choosing them, permissions, measuring and photographing, what to record, and analysis sheets a jury can read.
About the rules below: Council of Architecture (COA) rules apply to every B.Arch programme. Rules quoted from one university apply only there and are labelled with its name and year. Measuring technique is summarised from a published government standard. Everything else is MOA guidance and is labelled as such. Your own studio brief always wins.
COA's Minimum Standards of Architectural Education Regulations, 2020 build documenting buildings into the course from the start:
In practice that starts in first year. In the 2024-25 Basic Design II plan at SPA Vijayawada, students in groups of eight pick a kiosk or stall in the city in week 2 and produce its measured drawing, go on a study trip in week 5, and spend weeks 6 to 9 on documentation reviews before the design problem begins.
| Live case study | Literature case study | |
|---|---|---|
| Source | Your own visit, measurements, photographs and conversations | Published drawings, books, journals, the architect's own publications |
| What it gives you | How the building is actually used, maintained and adapted; real light, heat and noise | Buildings you cannot visit, often with complete drawings and the architect's intent |
| What it cannot give | Full drawings, unless the owner or architect shares them | Wear, misuse and what users think |
| Main risk | Measuring errors and missing areas you could not access | Unverified drawings, and renders mistaken for built work |
Schools often fix the mix. Shivaji University's B.Arch IX and X syllabus (from June 2018) asks thesis students for two live case studies, at least one book case study and at least one net case study, "with comparative analysis and statement". Case studies carry 50 of the 100 internal marks for that stage, and students are told to plan this work during their 16-week practical training. If your training semester is coming up, our internships guide covers it.
How to choose (MOA guidance): pick buildings that share your thesis problem, not just your building type. A useful set is one live study close to home that you can revisit, one live study in a similar climate or at a similar scale, and one literature study of a building that handles your core problem well. For literature studies, take drawings from the architect's own publications or a credible journal, and check whether an image is a photograph or a render. Projects on MOA show built work by Indian studios with their own descriptions, which is a starting point for finding comparable buildings to request a visit to.
No national rule covers visiting a private or institutional building for a student case study, so this part is MOA guidance:
If your case study is a centrally protected monument, the Archaeological Survey of India's FAQ sets out the basics under the 1958 Act and its rules:
MOA guidance: for anything beyond hand-held photographs, such as a tripod, lights or a long measuring session, write to the ASI circle office for the monument well in advance and carry the reply with you. State-protected monuments come under state archaeology departments, so ask them.
A measured drawing records a building as it is, which is how Mohanlal Sukhadia University's 2021-22 B.Arch syllabus frames it: its fourth-semester Measured Drawing and Documentation course starts with the difference between measured and working drawings, covers conventional, modern and digital measuring techniques, uses sketching and photography as documentation tools, and asks for graphical documentation: a site plan, plans, sections, elevations and details at a suitable architectural scale.
For the technique itself, the clearest published standard we found is the HABS measured drawing guidelines from the US National Park Service (2008). Its core rules apply on any Indian site:
On the day (MOA guidance): split the team into a sketcher, two on the tape and a recorder who also photographs. Carry 5 m and 30 m steel tapes, a laser distance meter, string and a line level, a plumb bob, a compass and graph paper. Record in millimetres. Draw the plan up that evening; if the diagonals do not close, go back and re-measure.
Photographs are evidence, not decoration. As MOA guidance, work from a shot list:
Number each photo and mark where you stood, and which way you faced, on a key plan.
Use the same checklist (MOA's) for every building so the comparison at the end is fair.
| Category | What to record |
|---|---|
| Site and context | Location, plot shape and area, access and entries, levels, neighbours, north, views, noise |
| Regulations | Ground coverage, FAR, setbacks and height as built; our guide to setbacks, FAR and height limits explains them |
| Climate | Orientation, shading, openings, courtyards, roof form, where it is hot, cold or stuffy in use |
| Users | Who uses it, how many, at what hours; staff versus visitors; accessibility |
| Programme | Spaces and their areas, zoning, adjacencies, circulation share, built versus open |
| Structure | System, grid, typical spans, expansion joints, how loads reach the ground |
| Services | Water, drainage, electrical and HVAC routes, shafts, plant rooms, fire exits |
| Materials | Wall and roof build-up, finishes, how they have aged, maintenance problems |
| Use and feedback | What users praise or complain about, and changes made since opening |
If sustainability is part of your thesis, note any green rating the building claims; our green building certification guide explains what each rating covers.
A case study is judged on what you conclude, not how much you collected. As MOA guidance, give each building the same sheet layout.
Order your sheets as a story: why this building, key facts, drawings, analysis, inferences, then the comparison. Mark every drawing as measured, redrawn from a named source, or published, and credit every photograph you did not take. Shivaji University's syllabus also suggests reading published critiques in architecture magazines to learn the technical language.
Good case-study sheets often earn a place in your portfolio as proof you can observe and draw. Our architecture portfolio examples show how Indian students present research pages.
A study of a building you visit yourself: you measure and photograph it, observe how it is used and, where possible, talk to its users.
The COA regulations do not set a number. Schools do: Shivaji University's 2018 syllabus, for example, asks for two live, at least one book and at least one net case study. Check your own thesis brief.
A literature study reviews books, papers, codes and standards on your topic. A literature case study analyses one specific building using published material. A live case study analyses a building you visit.
For private and institutional buildings, ask the owner or manager in writing first, as a matter of courtesy and access (MOA guidance). At ASI-protected monuments, hand-held photography is allowed, but tripods and extra lights need written permission from an archaeological officer.
Syllabi usually say "a suitable architectural scale". As MOA guidance, 1:50 suits plans and sections of small buildings, 1:100 or 1:200 larger ones, and 1:10 or 1:20 details.
Finished a strong study? Put your case studies and portfolio on MOA, free.