Raj Rewal and Mahendra Raj's 1972 Hall of Nations in Delhi: a 78 m concrete space frame cast by hand, its section, joints and climate role, and its 2017 demolition in dated facts.
The Hall of Nations was an exhibition hall at Pragati Maidan, New Delhi, designed by Raj Rewal with the structural engineer Mahendra Raj and opened for the Asia 72 trade fair in 1972. Its walls and roof were a single concrete space frame in the shape of a truncated pyramid, spanning 78 m without a column, and it was cast in place largely by hand. It was demolished on the night of 23 to 24 April 2017. Below: brief, structure, construction, the court cases in dated facts and lessons, with MOA diagrams.
Hall of Nations: the facts
Architect: Raj Rewal (Raj Rewal Associates). Structural engineer: Mahendra Raj. Contractor: Puri Construction, the lowest tenderer, according to Mahendra Raj. Rewal also credits an engineer he names as Dorairaj (Durai Raj in another interview).
Client and occasion: built for the Government of India's Asia 72, the international trade fair held in the 25th year of independence. The V&A says Rewal won a competition for the complex; the M+ archive notes say the commission came under Prime Minister Indira Gandhi. The India Trade Promotion Organisation (ITPO) later ran the site.
Location: Pragati Maidan, New Delhi.
Designed and built: work began in 1969 according to The Hindu; Rewal's office and the V&A date the design to 1970. Completed in 1972. Sources give the construction time as 15, 18 or 22 months (see below).
Type and size: exhibition hall, the largest of four truncated pyramids, with the Nehru Pavilion nearby. 82 m x 82 m at the base and 27 m high, with about 6,700 sq m of column-free floor (Mahendra Raj Consultants); 78 m clear span, inside height 3 m to 21 m (Raj Rewal Associates).
Status: demolished in April 2017. The site is now part of the International Exhibition-cum-Convention Centre, named Bharat Mandapam in July 2023.
Asia 72 was part of the celebrations of 25 years of independence. In his 2017 essay, Martino Stierli, MoMA's chief curator of architecture and design, describes it as a building meant to show India as a modern nation built on science and technology. The Twentieth Century Society's building of the month entry (Christopher Turner, July 2024) notes that Indira Gandhi inaugurated it.
Rewal's own project page, on the Raj Rewal Associates site, sets out the brief as a set of limits: little time, scarce materials, and a labour force rather than machines. He calls the answer "intermediate technology", neither traditional craft nor imported industry. It also places the complex at the centre of 130 acres of exhibition grounds that Rewal planned.
The time limit was real. Rewal told Nirmal Kulkarni in October 2017 (reproduced on Architexturez) that the structure had to go up in 18 months, and told architecture.live in June 2017 that the design took two to three months.
The Hall of Nations was not Pragati Maidan's only experiment. Mahendra Raj Consultants list Charles Correa's Hindustan Lever Pavilion (1961) there, and from 1971 and 1972 Kuldip Singh's M Pavilion and a folded-plate steel pavilion for Delhi Cloth Mills by Jasbir Sawhney. Raj engineered all of them.
The Hall of Nations was the largest of four truncated pyramids linked by ramps (MoMA; V&A). To its west, the C20 entry describes the Nehru Pavilion as an underground gallery, the "negative" of the pyramids, with a mound that recalls a stupa.
Climate shaped what follows: Rewal told Kulkarni his starting point was the strength of the Indian sun. For how ordinary houses in the city deal with the same heat, see our guide to building materials in Delhi NCR.
Rewal had studied space frames while in London, according to the M+ archive notes on his drawings. In the Kulkarni interview he names two other sources. One was Pier Luigi Nervi's concrete trusses: if those could be made in concrete, he asked, why not a space frame? The other was the triangular lattice of Indian geometry, which he traces to yantras and to Mughal screens.
The key idea is that one element did two jobs. A span of 256 ft needed a frame about 16 ft deep, Rewal says, and that depth could also act as a sun breaker. His office describes the result as a version of the jali, the perforated screen that cuts glare and lets air through. If you are designing screens at house scale, our jaali design guide covers patterns, materials and where they work.
Rewal's office describes the plan as a vast square with eight openings, closed by pivoted steel gates and reached by stairs and ramps, with services and facilities tucked under those approaches. Mahendra Raj Consultants say the pyramid stood on eight points. Their figures for the main hall:
Rewal's office gives a 78 m clear span inside, with inside heights from 3 m at the edges to 21 m: the free space within the frame. MoMA gives 144 ft long and up to 90 ft high; we could not reconcile that length with the other sources.
No source describes the layout of the four halls closely enough to diagram it without tracing a real drawing, so MOA has not drawn a plan. Rewal's floor plan is in the M+ collection in Hong Kong, with two sections, a perspective and two joint sketches.
In section the hall was a truncated pyramid whose sloping sides and flat top were one double-layer space frame. Mahendra Raj, in excerpts published by architecture.live in April 2018, describes the scheme as basically "a pyramid with a double layered space-frame". He made every member the same size in geometry, so that pyramidal units could be placed side by side, and he notes that up to nine members met at some joints.
The chapter on the hall in The Structure: Works of Mahendra Raj (Vandini Mehta, Rohit Raj Mehndiratta and Ariel Huber, 2016), whose drawing captions are reproduced on Architexturez, adds the detail:
Below ground, Mahendra Raj Consultants say the Hall of Nations sat on piles tied by post-tensioned plinth beams, stressed in stages, while the Halls of Industries used spread footings tied with high-tensile steel bars.
Was it the first? The V&A says the world's first and largest-span concrete space frame; MoMA, the largest when completed; Mahendra Raj Consultants, the first in India and possibly the world.
The choice of concrete was economic: Rewal told Kulkarni that steel in that quantity was not available in India, and MoMA gives the same reason.
The method changed after the design was done. Mahendra Raj's account runs in three steps:
Mahendra Raj Consultants' note agrees: a nine-member joint was developed for precast work, but the builder preferred casting in situ.
The site ran on labour. The C20 entry says about 300 families lived on site, fifty carpenters made the wooden boxes the concrete was poured into, and concrete went up a bamboo scaffold in baskets; the V&A says 300 workers poured it by hand.
Sources disagree on time: 15 months to analyse, design and build (Mahendra Raj Consultants), 18 months (Rewal; the V&A says just over a year and a half) and 22 months, within budget (The Quint, 26 April 2017).
The frame was the climate system. Rewal told the C20 that the building was a three-dimensional jaali, left open without glass for years, so air moved through it and it needed no air conditioning. The sun hit the outer layer of members while the inner face, 16 ft further in, stayed in shade.
By December 2006, in the photo below, the triangles of the sloping faces held glazing with patterned screens and darker solid panels. We found no dated source on when the hall was enclosed.
On services, the sources say little beyond the plan: eight gated openings with facilities beneath the approaches, for exhibits Rewal's office lists as "from books to bulldozers".
INTACH included it, with the Nehru Pavilion, in a list of 62 modern buildings it forwarded to Delhi's Heritage Conservation Committee (HCC). Museums including MoMA and the Centre Pompidou asked the government to preserve it (The Quint), and the C20 entry records appeals from ARCASIA and the International Union of Architects.
The dated facts, from the Delhi High Court's 2019 judgment, The Hindu's court reports reproduced on Architexturez, and the sources named:
| Date | What happened |
|---|---|
| November 2015 | ITPO announces redevelopment of Pragati Maidan into a convention and exhibition centre; the Hall of Nations and Hall of Industries are to go (The Quint). |
| 24 February 2016 | The High Court dismisses Rewal's first writ petition, W.P.(C) 1146/2016: pending requests for heritage status cannot stall redevelopment (as recited in the 2019 judgment). |
| 20 April 2017 | Justice Sanjeev Sachdeva dismisses W.P.(C) 2731/2017, which asked for the buildings to be declared works of national importance. He relies on the HCC's decision that only buildings over 60 years old qualify (The Hindu, via Architexturez). An INTACH petition was listed for 1 May. |
| Night of 23 to 24 April 2017 | ITPO demolishes the Hall of Nations, the Halls of Industries and the Nehru Pavilion (MoMA; C20). The Quint dates it 25 April. |
| 27 April 2017 | A Division Bench of Acting Chief Justice Gita Mittal and Justice Anu Malhotra hears Rewal's appeal; his counsel says he will seek restitution (The Hindu, via Architexturez). The appeal was later disposed of as infructuous. |
| 28 May 2019 | Justice Rajiv Sahai Endlaw dismisses Rewal's suit, CS(COMM) 3/2018, which sought reconstruction under Section 57 of the Copyright Act (judgment). |
| 26 July 2023 | The new International Exhibition-cum-Convention Centre on the site is inaugurated and named Bharat Mandapam, ahead of the G20 Summit in September 2023 (Outlook). |
So, why was it demolished? The owner, ITPO, wanted the land for a larger exhibition and convention centre, and the HCC's 60-year threshold meant the building had no heritage protection. The 2019 judgment found that an architect's moral rights under Section 57 do not let him object to the demolition of a building or claim damages for it. It also said the owners had owed Rewal a duty to tell him in advance and explain their reasons, and had erred in not doing so.
Rewal, Mahendra Raj and others called the demolition an outrage (The Quint).
Our reading, from the sources above:
If you are choosing a thesis on exhibition or public buildings, our B.Arch thesis topics by typology lists related briefs.
There is nothing left to visit: the site is now Bharat Mandapam. To study the building:
Looking for an architect who thinks about structure and climate together? Find an architect on MOA.
Raj Rewal was the architect and Mahendra Raj the structural engineer. Mahendra Raj names Puri Construction as the contractor. It opened in 1972 for the Asia 72 trade fair.
Design began in 1969 or 1970, depending on the source, and the hall was completed in 1972. Sources give the construction time as 15, 18 or 22 months.
ITPO demolished it in April 2017 to redevelop Pragati Maidan into a new exhibition and convention centre, now Bharat Mandapam. Delhi's Heritage Conservation Committee had not protected it because it was under 60 years old, and the High Court dismissed Rewal's petitions.
Reinforced concrete cast in situ, as a double-layer space frame of rhombic members with chamfered edges, used because steel was not available in the quantity needed. The gates were steel.
Mahendra Raj Consultants give 82 m x 82 m at the base and 27 m high, with about 6,700 sq m of column-free floor. Rewal's office gives a 78 m clear span and an inside height of 3 m to 21 m.