Fariborz Sahba's Bahá'í House of Worship in Delhi: 27 marble-clad concrete shells in three rings, how they were set out and poured, the pools that cool the hall, and lessons for India.
The Lotus Temple is the Bahá'í House of Worship in south Delhi, designed by Fariborz Sahba and dedicated on 24 December 1986. It is a reinforced concrete structure of 27 thin shells, the "petals", set in three rings of nine and clad in white Greek marble, over a central hall cooled by air drawn across nine pools. Below: the brief, site, geometry, plan, section, construction, climate strategy, reception and lessons, with MOA diagrams.
Lotus Temple: the facts
Architect: Fariborz Sahba (spelled Fariburz in many 1980s sources), who also managed the project. Structural engineers: Flint & Neill Partnership, London. Main contractor: Engineering Construction Corporation, the ECC Construction Group of Larsen & Toubro.
Client: the Bahá'í community of India; the Universal House of Justice approved the design on 3 August 1977.
Location: Bahapur, south Delhi, on land once part of Bahapur village.
Dates: foundation stone 17 October 1977; contract awarded April 1980; first concrete 30 July 1980; dedicated 24 December 1986; open to the public from 1 January 1987.
Type: a House of Worship with a central hall, plus a reception and administration block. Seating: 1,300 (The Bahá'í World, vol. 20); an earlier account gives about 1,200 seats with room for about 1,000 more in balconies. Site: about 26 acres (vol. 20); an earlier report gives 22 acres.
Status: in use as a place of worship and open to visitors of every background.
Sahba was invited to design the temple rather than winning a competition. In his own account in The Bahá'í World, volume 18, Dr Raḥmatu'lláh Muhájir suggested he prepare a design for India while Sahba was an associate architect on the Seat of the Universal House of Justice in Haifa. He had received his master's in architecture from Tehran University's School of Fine Arts in 1972, according to his website.
The brief, as the sources describe it:
Volume 18 describes a hilly site of about 92,000 square metres in five plots, once part of the village of Bahapur. To found the building, Sheriar Nooreyezdan reports, the builders carved a bowl about 150 m across and dug seven sets of nine pits in concentric circles for 63 columns and abutments. Hard rock was reached in every pit, some at thirty feet. About 6,000 cubic metres of rock came out without machines, carried away in head-loads. The building stands on a raised podium among lawns, so the petals are seen across open ground rather than from a street. For the materials ordinary houses in the city use, see our guide to building materials in Delhi NCR.
The lotus was Sahba's starting point: "I resolved to justify the lotus as a concept for the House of Worship," he writes in volume 18. Roger White, quoted on Sahba's project page, reads it as a flower of purity rising from murky water. Two ideas follow from it:
For students, the point is that the image is not decoration on a box: the petals are structure, roof and walls at once.
Read from the centre outwards, the plan is a set of rings, each divided into nine bays at 40 degree intervals (Naharoy):
A basement under the podium holds the electrical and plumbing services, and Sabikhi notes that four of the pools were lowered to basement level to bring it light and air. He also found that the circular route pulls visitors round the edge, so the hall lacks a single focal point: the cost of a plan with no front and no axis.
Every petal is a thin concrete shell, and each ring has its own shape and job. Figures are from Naharoy's 1986 article; the heights match volume 20.
| Element | Role | Geometry | Size in sources |
|---|---|---|---|
| 9 entrance leaves | Canopies over the entrances, opening outwards | Parts of spheres | 18.2 m wide, 7.8 m high |
| 9 outer leaves | Point inwards over the outer hall | Doubly curved shells | 15.4 m wide, up to 22.5 m high; 135 mm thick at the bottom to 255 mm towards the tip |
| 9 inner leaves | Close over the hall as a bud | Two toroidal surfaces per corrugation | 34.3 m above the inner podium; up to 14 m wide; 200 mm thick |
| 9 arches | Carry almost the whole load | Plane, conical and cylindrical surfaces | At 40 degree spacing |
Sources differ on the outer leaves. Thomas Fisher in Progressive Architecture (June 1987) gives the inner leaves as "a uniform 7.8 inches thick", which matches 200 mm, and the outer leaves as 5 to 10 inches, but thickening from top to bottom, the opposite of the contractor's figures. Check the engineers' paper before drawing a wall section.
Inside the bud is a second structure. Three ribs spring from the crown of each arch, one running up to a central hub and two meeting the ribs of the neighbouring arches, with two layers of 60 mm shells between them up to a certain height. This interior dome rises about 28 m above the hall floor (volume 18). Near the top, nine radial beams brace the leaves and meet at a hub, sitting on a neoprene pad so that the dome can move with temperature and wind.
The engineers, Flint & Neill of London, had also worked on the Bahá'í temple in Panama. Volume 18 records that wind tunnel tests were run on a scale model and that structural drawings were checked in Geneva by Prof Hushmand Naimi. The full engineering account is A. R. Flint, D. I. Cooper and S. Naharoy, "The structural design and construction of two Bahá'í Houses of Worship", The Structural Engineer, March 1987.
Naharoy explains that every surface was defined as part of a sphere, cylinder, torus or cone, so that it could be written as equations, analysed and set out. The detailed drawings took more than two and a half years; Sahba's site says the working drawings were finished in his London office by 1979. Coordinates for each 40 degree segment were computed at IIT Madras, and the curves were set out with a one-second theodolite and stepped templates. Because the shape repeats nine times, one segment solved is nine solved.
Volume 18 dates the first arch to 26 March 1982 and the ninth to 26 July 1982. A labour strike stopped work until 16 January 1984, and the last part of the superstructure, the roof of the fan chamber at the top, was concreted in December 1985 (volume 19). Workforce figures differ: about 800 workers and 40 engineers and supervisors (Naharoy, volume 20) against about 400 labourers in volume 19's report.
For how marble compares with Kota, granite and sandstone, see our natural stone guide.
The temple was designed to stay comfortable without air conditioning. Volume 18 describes the system: air is cooled over the pools and fountain sprays; the hall floor is lowered by three feet and the gaps between the steps act as louvres; warm air rises through the dome and escapes at the top, helped by impellers and expellers in the fan chamber; and the system can be reversed in winter. Smoke tests on a model checked the design.
Daylight enters through the glass roof at the top of the bud, so the dome is "translucent to the sky by day" (volume 19). At night, lights are concealed in the interior dome, and the outdoor lighting won a 1988 award from the Illuminating Engineering Society of North America.
Our reading: cooling over open water works best in Delhi's hot, dry months and less well in the humid monsoon. The sources publish no measured temperatures inside the hall.
Our reading, from the sources above:
Documenting it for a studio? Our case study field checklist gives a sheet layout, and our thesis topics by typology lists public and religious buildings worth studying.
The temple is open to visitors of every faith. Check the Plan a Visit page on the official site of the Bahá'í House of Worship, New Delhi, for days, hours and rules; we do not print timings here. For drawings, start with the 1986 Bahá'í News article and the engineers' 1987 paper; the diagrams in this post are MOA's own schematics.
Want an architect who can carry a bold idea through to how it is built? Find an architect on MOA.
Fariborz Sahba, an Iranian-trained architect, designed it and managed its construction. Flint & Neill Partnership of London were the structural engineers, and the ECC Construction Group of Larsen & Toubro was the main contractor.
The foundation stone was laid on 17 October 1977, construction started in 1980, and the temple was dedicated on 24 December 1986. It opened to the public on 1 January 1987.
Reinforced white concrete shells, made with white cement, dolomite aggregate and galvanised steel, clad outside in white marble from Mount Pentelikon in Greece fixed with stainless steel anchors. The walkways are red sandstone.
27 petals in three rings of nine: entrance leaves 7.8 m high, outer leaves up to 22.5 m and inner leaves rising 34.3 m above the inner podium. The interior dome is about 28 m above the hall floor.
Air is cooled over nine pools and fountains, enters at low level through gaps between the hall steps, rises through the dome and leaves at the top, with fans to help. It was designed to avoid air conditioning.