A Shanghai Tower case study for students: the 120-degree twist and the wind load it saved, nine stacked zones, the hung outer skin, sky-garden atria, super columns, outriggers and the 1,000-tonne damper.
Shanghai Tower is a 632 m office, hotel and observation tower in Shanghai's Lujiazui district, designed by Gensler with Thornton Tomasetti as structural engineer and completed in 2015. It shows how a twisting, tapering form cut the wind load, how a hung glass skin wraps a round inner building with sky-garden atria between, and how super columns, outriggers and a damper keep it standing and still. Below: brief, site, plan, structure, facade, services, the record since opening, and lessons for India.
Shanghai Tower at a glance
Figures from Gensler's facade paper (Zeljic, 2010), the CTBUH, Thornton Tomasetti and a Tongji University paper; where sources disagree we give both. Diagrams are MOA's own schematics.
The programme was a mixed-use supertall. Gensler's facade leader Aleksandar Zeljic, in a 2010 conference paper published by Gensler, lists five main functions: office, boutique office, a luxury hotel, retail and cultural venues in the podium, and an observation experience at the top. It calls the tower a "self-sustaining vertical city".
Gensler partner Dan Winey told Architectural Record (Clifford A. Pearson, October 2015) that the aim was "vertical urbanism". Jun Xia, the Gensler partner who grew up in Shanghai, explained the idea through the city itself: "Shanghai is a city of small parks that help define neighborhoods."
The tower completes a group of three supertalls in the Lujiazui finance district of Pudong, across the Huangpu River from the Bund. Its neighbours are SOM's Jin Mao Tower, about 421 m (1,381 ft), and KPF's Shanghai World Financial Center, about 492 m (1,615 ft) (Architectural Record). Zeljic calls it "the third and final" planned super-high-rise of the district, and says the podium was meant to give uninterrupted public circulation between the three towers.
Wind tests found the two neighbours raise local turbulence intensity by 14% to 40% (Zeljic), and RWDI notes the site is typhoon-prone and seismic. For how to set out a site study like this one, see our guide to documenting a building for a case study.
The tower is divided vertically into nine zones (Gensler; Architectural Record). Each zone is a round building of 12 to 15 storeys (12 in zone 2, rising to 15 in zone 8, per Zeljic), sitting inside a single glass skin. Between the round building and the skin are atria, which Gensler calls sky gardens. Architectural Record counts 21 atria, each 10 to 14 storeys high, with shops and restaurants at their base; Xia called them "interior parks". The CTBUH, recognising the completed tower in January 2016, described each zone as rising from a sky lobby, a "light-filled garden atrium" (Illinois Tech, 8 January 2016).
Zeljic names Norman Foster's Commerzbank in Frankfurt as the best-known precedent, and says Shanghai's humidity, up to 95%, made the idea a new challenge.
Each typical floor is a circle. The outer skin is a rounded triangle based, Zeljic explains, on an equilateral triangle smoothed by two tangential curves offset at 60 degrees, with a V-shaped notch at one corner that runs up the full height. The three corners left between the circle and the triangle are the atria; Zeljic's paper refers to three atria per zone. Zone 9 at the top has neither the inner wall nor atria.
Uses stack by zone. Architectural Record gives retail and conference space in the bottom zone, offices in zones 2 to 6, the hotel in zones 7 and 8, and observation levels at the top, with pairs of mechanical and refuge floors between the zones.
For the architects' own drawings, see the Zeljic facade paper (figures 2, 3, 12, 13 and 20) and on Gensler's project page.
The form is controlled by three variables, Zeljic writes: the plan profile; a vertical profile on an exponential curve, keeping a wide footprint for the lower third and narrowing by about 55% overall; and a rate of twist, a simple linear rotation from base to top. RWDI tested the options at 1:500 scale against a wind climate model that included simulated typhoons.
The team compared rotations of 90, 120, 150, 180 and 210 degrees and scalings from 25% to 85% against a tapered box. A scaling of about 55% with 120 degrees of rotation gave up to 24% savings in structural wind loading and cladding pressure, which Zeljic puts at about US$50 million in the structure alone. A 180-degree twist would have cut loads by a further 9%, but was not pursued for aesthetic reasons. Later accounts repeat the 24% figure, though the saving varies: Gensler told Architectural Record in 2015 that the shape "saved $58 million in materials", and Thornton Tomasetti says only that it reduced material cost.
Wei Huang and Jiang Qian of Tongji University, in a 2014 paper on the lateral system, describe a steel-concrete hybrid "mega frame, core tube, outrigger" structure:
Their analysis finds the core is the first line of seismic resistance and the super columns the second. Thornton Tomasetti adds that the outriggers and super columns draw their stiffness from the concrete inner building, and that they also carry the twisting curtain wall. The structural plan is 83.6 m across at the base and 42 m in zone 8 (Huang and Qian).
Thornton Tomasetti says the core stands on 1,079 concrete and steel bored piles. The World Construction Network describes a 6 m thick mat of 61,000 m³ of concrete placed by more than 2,000 workers and finished in March 2010. Zeljic, writing before construction, gives a 6 m mat and "about 3,500 piles" for the whole foundation system and an expected building weight of about 850,000 tonnes; we could not reconcile his pile count with Thornton Tomasetti's, and his may include the podium.
Near the top hangs a tuned mass damper. Thornton Tomasetti calls it a double-hung pendulum that reduces wind-induced movement, and RWDI says it was added as an "extra guarantee" of occupant comfort after the form had already cut most motion. China Daily, republished by the Shanghai government in August 2025, gives a 1,000-tonne eddy current damper on the 125th floor, hung from 12 steel cables, with a sway range of 2 m in each direction. CGTN (14 August 2026) cites a 2017 Tongji University study for up to 60% less wind-induced movement; we have not seen that study.
The facade is two glass walls with the atria between. Zeljic calls them Curtain Wall A, the outer twisting skin, and Curtain Wall B, the inner wall around each round building, with about 210,000 m² of glazing between them at design stage.
Curtain Wall A does not sit on the floors. Its main support is a horizontal ring beam of 356 mm steel pipe at every 4.5 m of height (4.3 m in zones 7 and 8). Pairs of 60 to 80 mm high-strength rods hang these ring beams from the mechanical and refuge floor above. Radial struts of 219 mm pipe, rigidly fixed to the ring and hinged at the slab edge, carry wind load back to the inner building while letting the skin slide up and down. Zeljic gives the largest vertical movement as 114 mm, at zone 2.
Shanghai's codes required insulated glass for any wall enclosing conditioned space, which in panels up to 2.2 by 4.5 m would have added about 25% to the outer glass weight. After review by client, city and government expert panels, Curtain Wall A was treated as a weather screen for an unconditioned, ventilated atrium, and the inner Curtain Wall B became the true thermal wall. That let the outer skin use laminated glass (12 mm low-iron, an SGP interlayer, 12 mm low-iron) while the inner wall used insulated units (Zeljic).
As built, Architectural Record reports more than 20,000 curtain wall panels in more than 7,000 unique shapes, set out with lasers fixed at 30 locations across Pudong.
The atrium works as a thermal buffer. Zeljic says only the lowest 15 feet or so of each atrium is mildly conditioned, by perimeter fan coil units, mainly in weather extremes; the rest is ventilated by natural updraft, regulated exhausts at the top and spill air from the floors. Energy modelling put the whole building about 21% better than ASHRAE 90.1-2004 and about 12.5% better than China's Three-Star baseline, with 7% of that from the skin.
Gensler's project page lists LEED Platinum, a China Three-Star rating and 270 wind turbines; Architectural Record says the turbines power exterior lighting, and quotes Gensler's figure of a 34,000-tonne annual cut in carbon emissions against conventional projects. These are design or certification claims. We found no published, metered energy record for the occupied tower, so treat them as targets. The CTBUH lists 106 lifts, with a top speed of 20.5 m/s; China Daily gives 18 m/s.
This is our reading, not a claim from the sources.
For a tall-building thesis, our B.Arch thesis topics by typology lists commercial and mixed-use briefs where these questions come up.
The observation deck is on the 118th floor, according to China Daily's August 2025 report, which also describes a guided tour that includes the damper on the 126th floor and a glass dining room on the 121st floor, 561 m above the ground. The podium connects to the metro by escalator (Architectural Record). Check opening hours and tickets on the tower's official site, shanghaitower.com.cn, which we could not load when writing this. The offices and hotel floors are private.
Looking for an architect who can take a building from form to facade to services? Find an architect on MOA.
Foundation work began around late 2008, with construction from 2009 by the CTBUH's dates. The tower was completed in 2015, and China Daily reports that it officially opened in April 2017.
Gensler was the design architect, with Tongji Architectural Design (Group) as architect of record and Thornton Tomasetti as structural engineer. The client was Shanghai Tower Construction & Development Co.
It is 632 m (2,073 ft) to the top, with the highest occupied floor at 583.4 m, per the CTBUH. The CTBUH and Thornton Tomasetti give 128 floors above ground; Gensler's 2010 facade paper counted 120 floors plus four equipment floors, and China Daily says 132.
China Daily gives 1,000 tonnes, hung from 12 steel cables on the 125th floor, using eddy currents to slow its swing. It reduces wind-induced sway for people on the upper floors.
China Daily gave 14.8 billion yuan (US$2.2 billion) in 2017; Architectural Record gave US$1.54 billion for construction and US$2.2 billion for the whole project in 2015.