A Bosco Verticale case study for architecture students: the brief, plan and section, cantilevered balconies, wind tests and tree restraints, irrigation, the flying gardeners, criticism, and lessons for India.
Bosco Verticale ("Vertical Forest") is a pair of residential towers in Milan's Porta Nuova district, designed by Boeri Studio (Stefano Boeri, Gianandrea Barreca and Giovanni La Varra) and finished in 2014. Each balcony is a cantilevered concrete slab with a planter on its edge, and the towers carry about 800 trees, 4,500 shrubs and 20,000 plants by the architects' count. This case study covers the brief, the plan and section, how the trees were engineered against wind, how they are watered and maintained, what critics said, and what designers in India should take from it.
Bosco Verticale at a glance
From Stefano Boeri Architetti's project page, Arup, the AIPH Green City case study, Dezeen and Il Post. Sources give different heights and plant counts; see "The numbers do not agree".
If you are writing this up for a studio or thesis, our guide on how to document a building sets out the method a jury expects.
The towers are part of Porta Nuova, a large redevelopment in central Milan; its Isola section replaced a light industrial site, a 2014 Construction Management report says. Arup lists the client as Hines Italia SGR, now COIMA SGR.
The programme was luxury housing: Dezeen counts 111 flats, and the architects' project page gives sizes from 60 to 400 sq m (about 650 to 4,300 sq ft). The unusual part was the second client: Boeri calls the building, as Dezeen quotes him, a "home for trees that also houses humans and birds", and the architects' page gives at least 2 trees, 8 shrubs and 40 plants per resident.
The towers stand in the Isola district near Porta Garibaldi station, on Via de Castillia and Via Confalonieri, Il Post reported in 2015. Around them Porta Nuova added the UniCredit Tower, Piazza Gae Aulenti and new parks. Next to the towers is BAM, the Biblioteca degli Alberi Milano, a public park owned by the City of Milan and run by the Riccardo Catella Foundation.
Below ground, Arup reports that the towers sit above Metro line M2 with two railway tunnels nearby, which were monitored during construction; the towers have a vibration base-isolation system that, Arup says, also gives seismic protection. Draw these tunnels in a site analysis.
The idea is simple to state: put a forest on a tower instead of spreading it across land. The architects claim the planting equals about five hectares of flat parkland on roughly 1,000 sq m of footprint, and that housing the same people in detached houses with gardens would cover almost 75,000 sq m. These are the architects' own comparisons; other sources give smaller forest equivalents (see below).
In 2014 the studio called it "biological architecture" in its text for Dezeen. Read that against what follows: the planting needed wind tunnels, steel cages and central irrigation to work.
The towers are plain rectangular blocks, Dezeen notes, clad in dark ceramic panels. The plan has three ideas a student can draw:
Planting follows orientation: evergreens on the south-west and deciduous species on the north-east (architects), or olives and fruit trees to the south and leaf-shedding trees to the north to save winter daylight (AIPH). It was also specified floor by floor, as wind and humidity change with height.
We have not reproduced the architects' plans. Dezeen's 2014 article publishes the studio's section and concept sections; use those for the real drawings.
The structure is a post-tensioned concrete frame. Arup's tests, Construction Management reported, showed that a "fairly conventional" post-tensioned frame would carry the planting, although the design had no corner columns, which made the balcony cantilevers longer. Arup and Dezeen give the balcony projection as 3.35 m (about 11 ft); the architects' page says three metres.
The surprise for most students is that weight was not the main problem. AIPH states that the trees produce most of their load through the wind force they pass to the structure, not their mass. Arup's project manager Luca Buzzoni told Construction Management that "there is very little available literature on the subject of trees growing on facades", and that in strong winds the trees could create "a significant bending moment on the slabs".
Arup ran two wind tunnel campaigns. According to AIPH:
For each species, in each of three size profiles, the team looked at maximum canopy size, centre of gravity and how much air passes through the leaves. The load on each slab was set by the weight of the deepest planter, AIPH notes.
Arup describes two kinds of restraint. Medium and large trees have a safety cable against trunk failure. The largest trees in the most exposed positions also sit in a steel cage that holds the root ball and stops the tree overturning in a major storm. AIPH puts these at about 6 to 7% of the trees and describes the cage as an underground steel frame that ties the roots to the inner face of the planter.
The soil itself was a balance: dense enough to anchor roots, light enough not to overload the pre-stressed balconies (AIPH). The trees were grown in a Milan nursery first, partly to limit their growth and weight (Construction Management).
The frame is reinforced and post-tensioned concrete, with dark ceramic cladding and planters built into the balcony edges. Construction ran from 2009 to 2014 by Il Post's account, and the planting went in floor by floor. AIPH gives the sequence:
Species were studied for over two years with agronomists (architects) or three years with botanists and ethologists (AIPH), then pre-grown in nursery containers so their roots suited the planters. AIPH lists the criteria: canopy and foliage, roots that live in a container, and resistance to cold, wind, pollution, pests and drought. Arup says about 1,200 ladybirds were released for pest control.
Construction Management also noted a planter waterproofing system that still lets air reach the soil. For the basics, see our guide to waterproofing by climate in India.
The greenery is run as one system, not 111 private gardens. The architects say it is shared by all residents like the lobby, and that owners cannot modify, remove or replace it. AIPH adds that the balcony planting areas are not sold with the flats and that one contractor follows a plan written by the landscape consultant.
Climate claims come from the architects and should be read as claims, not measurements we have seen. The project page says shading and evapotranspiration lower surface temperatures "by up to 30 degrees" and indoor temperatures "by 2 to 3°C", cutting air-conditioning demand, and cites a 2022 European Space Agency map in which the towers and BAM appear on a par with Parco Sempione in lowering land surface temperature. AIPH reports about 19,000 kg of CO2 absorbed a year and says the planting helped the building gain LEED Gold.
The towers won the International Highrise Award in 2014 and CTBUH Best Tall Building Worldwide in 2015 (Arup also lists CTBUH Best Tall Building Europe 2014). In January 2025 Dezeen's Tom Ravenscroft named it the most significant building of 2014, quoting Ellis Woodman of the Architects' Journal, who called it a "pioneering project". Dezeen counts eight vertical forests since complete, eight under construction and 24 in design, including social housing in Eindhoven.
| Item | Architects' page | Other sources |
|---|---|---|
| Heights | 110 m and 76 m | 112 m and 80 m (Dezeen 2014, AIPH); 111 m and 76 m (Il Post) |
| Trees | 800 | 900 (Arup; Construction Management); 730 in Dezeen's 2014 project text |
| Shrubs | 4,500 | 5,000 (Arup; Dezeen 2014 and 2025) |
| Other plants | 20,000 | 11,000 (Arup); 15,000 (AIPH; Dezeen 2025) |
| Forest equivalent | about 5 hectares | over 2 hectares (AIPH); about 30,000 sq m (Boeri quoted by Dezeen 2025); 7,000 sq m (Il Post) |
| Balcony depth | 3 m | 3.35 m (Arup; Dezeen); just over 3 m (AIPH) |
Counts were made at different dates and plants are replaced, so quote the architects' figure and note the range.
These lessons are our reading. Towers sold with "a tree on every balcony" often copy the image; the lessons are in structure, soil, water and upkeep.
If you are comparing ratings, our guide to IGBC, GRIHA and LEED in India explains what a green certificate does and does not measure.
The towers are private homes, and the architects' page lists no public visits, so plan to see them from outside. The towers stand on Via de Castillia and Via Confalonieri near Porta Garibaldi station (Il Post), and the BAM park next to them is public. Look for the change of planting between faces and the balcony pattern shifting up the towers.
We use diagrams rather than photos in this post. Wikimedia Commons' freedom of panorama table lists Italy as having no freedom of panorama for buildings, and the architects are alive, so photos of the towers are not free to reuse.
Planning a terrace garden or planted facade? Find an architect on MOA.
Construction ran from 2009 to 2014, according to Il Post, and the architects list the project from 2007 to 2014. Trees went in from 2012 to 2014, floor by floor (AIPH).
Boeri Studio: Stefano Boeri, Gianandrea Barreca and Giovanni La Varra. Arup Italia was the structural engineer, and Studio Emanuela Borio and Laura Gatti were the botanical consultants. The client was Hines Italia, now COIMA SGR.
The architects give 800 trees, 4,500 shrubs and 20,000 plants of about 100 species. Arup and 2014 press reports give 900 trees; counts differ by source and date.
The architects give 110 m and 76 m; Dezeen and AIPH give 112 m and 80 m. Dezeen counts 27 and 19 storeys.
A central, remotely managed drip system with humidity sensors, fed by groundwater and recycled greywater and pumped with solar power. One team maintains all the greenery, including the "Flying Gardeners" who prune the trees from ropes.